|

[Click
here to see a review of Sports Illustrated's Feb. 15 issue]
SI's
Swimsuit Issue
Dull But Profitable
After
Reading The Whole Magazine (stop snickering), George
Finds The Articles Are Just Like The Rest Of The Issue.
By
George Stahl
My
assignment this week: Read Sports Illustrated’s Swimsuit issue.
Sure,
snicker all you want, but I mean it. I had to read SI’s Swimsuit
issue.
And
I’m not talking about the “Heidi / Swimsuit By Zimmermann ($125)
...” either. I’m talking about those four or five mostly full pages
of text that no one reads and that adolescents and adolescent-minded
men pass quicker than a 70-year-old going 30 mph on the highway.
So
why did I get picked for this nasty job? Well, my wife is out of
town this week and I ...
Now
see, there you go snickering again. That ain’t right. Honey,
I hope you’re having a great time in Minnesota - I’m sure there’s
lot to do in Minneapolis in February.
What
I was going to say is that with my wife out of town, I have more
free time to read and review the stories.
And
my impression of those stories? You ain’t missing much. After
an initial smack of excitement and interest, the stories became
tiresome, chauvinistic and dull.
Not
unlike the swimsuit magazine itself.
Don’t
get me wrong. I enjoy looking at beautiful women as much as the
next guy, but perfectly sculptured women in skimpy bathing suits
(or in no suits as is the case in some pictures this year) have
as much to do with sports as the Clintons’ marriage has to do with
love.
Besides
I look at a beautiful woman every day. Honey, so how's the weather
in Minny-sota?
Now,
I’m not one those Moral Majority fellas who feel the Swimsuit
issue should be abolished because it is akin to prostitution
- although it certainly could entertain Falcon Eugene Robinson for
less than $40 an hour. Rather, I simply accept the annual issue
for what it is - a huge moneymaking bandwagon for Sports Illustrated
and its parent company, Time-Warner.
Money
- now that has much to do with sports. So, in a sense, you could
say that the Swimsuit issue has nothing to do with sports but
yet everything to do with sports.
Didn’t
Lombardi say that once?
But
what I always find incredulous are the responses that are printed
in SI weeks after the issue. Letters to the editor like “I was shocked
to find this in Little Johnny’s mailbox. Cancel our subscription
immediately, you vile exploiters of flesh.”
What?
Did these people not realize that the issue was coming? It’s not
like Sports Illustrated tries to keep it a secret. Time-Warner
sells millions of dollars worth of calendars, videos and posters
based on this one issue, which it heavily promotes year-round.
This
issue should be as much of a surprise each year as Groundhog’s
Day, which is another item that fascinates millions for no earthly
reason.
Yet,
every year, SI’s Swimsuit issue ignites a response quicker than
Lawrence Taylor at a football writers dinner. But why? In this age
of http's and www's, pictures of naked women are a mouse-click away.
Plus, there
are many magazines that show more revealing shots of women than
this 204-page mislabeled Victoria’s Secret catalog.
This
year, though, I expect some intense negative responses because SI
may have painted itself into a corner. Literally. The magazine photographed
nude models with bathing suits painted on them by the same person
who colored in Demi Moore for those notorious Vanity Fair
colors.
Admittedly,
the effect is kind of neat because it appears at first glance that
the models are wearing a swimsuit. You really have to look at the
pictures carefully in order to appreciate the artwork.
You’re
snickering again.
Unfortunately,
though, the pictures are like one of those Magic Eye puzzles. The
more you stare, the more you see what’s really underneath. And
I’m sure many people aren’t going to appreciate that trick.
However,
to Sports Illustrated, it doesn’t matter because it already has
accomplished the toughest trick - making its now highly profitable
Swimsuit issue an accepted part of the annual American sports
scene.
Oh
yeah, as for the articles (funny, how it seems like they are
always forgotten), E.M. Swift’s story on yacht racing with 1998
cover model Heidi Klum was certainly the most enjoyable. Swift nicely
reported on the fun and the pain he had participating in the sailing
pro-am.
Austin
Murphy’s story on the body painting started out well and includes
the best line of the magazine. After seeing one of the models
up close in a bathing suit, Murphy writes that he found himself
“recalling the parting advice of my wife, Laura: ‘Try not to make
too big an ass of yourself.’” Unfortunately, he does, as the piece
slowly begins to sound like it was written by Beavis and/or Butt-Head.
Franz
Lidz’s look at Bomba Callwood and his rockin’ bar in the Caribbean
bored me, and I learned little new in William Nack’s profile of
billionaire Richard Branson, who owned the island where SI shot
the issue.
In
total, 25 pages of text were in this 204-page issue. Of course,
it took me about seven hours to read and review those 25 pages.
Hey,
you're snickering again!
Back
to top
Click
here to see a review of Sports Illustrated's Feb. 15 issue
Go
to the magazine page
To post a comment on the review, go to the Speak
Out page.
To e-mail your opinion to George, click
here.
|